After the implementation of the marriage law, the following property belongs to individuals. Is it meaningful for rural couples to get married and have a house and a car?

Enthusiasts in the field of agriculture, rural areas and farmers

In recent years, after rural development, there have been many problems. The simple folk customs have also "deteriorated" under the erosion of some bad customs. Money has become more and more important in family affection and marriage, and everyone has become more and more realized. The bride price has risen year by year under people's comparison, and the bad customs of marriage and funeral have become more and more intense, which makes farmers have suffering.

In addition to the rising bride price, in recent years, the phenomenon of "difficult marriage and fast divorce" has also appeared in rural areas. Almost all rural families have worried about these two problems. Especially for those young people with poor family conditions, it becomes more difficult to marry a daughter-in-law. While everyone is facing the difficulty of marriage, the phenomenon of rapid divorce also begins to appear. Many parents spend all their savings to help their son complete the marriage, but they encounter the phenomenon of rapid divorce. Some people divorce their newly married husband because they have too hard days after marriage, and others because of blind dates, The divorce rate in rural areas has risen sharply in recent years

The author found that in recent years, many couples in rural areas have divorced, rarely by agreement, mostly by litigation. The reason why the two sides go through legal procedures is mainly because of differences in the distribution of property. According to the provisions of China's marriage law, if they are divorced by litigation, they must distribute property according to the provisions of the "marriage law", which are the common property of husband and wife, What are personal property? There are boundaries. For example, when rural couples divorce, the following types of property belong to individuals, and one party has no right to divide them

First: the premarital property of husband and wife, such as the house bought by the man before marriage and the car bought by the woman before marriage, all belong to premarital property and belong to the individual at the time of divorce.

Second: parents give property, if; Before or after marriage, the husband's parents contribute to help their son buy a house, a car, or build a house in the countryside, then such property belongs to the property donated by their parents to their children and belongs to individuals.

Third: the testamentary contract determines the property. For thousands of years, after the death of the parents, the inheritance is inherited by the children. If after the death of the parents, the inheritance contract determines that the inheritance is inherited by the wife or husband, in this case, it also belongs to the individual, and the other party cannot part with it.

Fourth: husband and wife's personal daily necessities, such as women's cosmetics, clothes, etc., and men's watches, clothes, shoes, hats, etc., belong to personal property, except valuables.

Fifth: compensation for work-related injuries. For example, if the wife has an accident while working, the company will give a compensation or grant a subsidy to the injured employee in order to protect the life of the employee. At the time of divorce, such property also belongs to the individual.

So the question is, after the implementation of the marriage law, the above five types of property belong to individuals. Before rural couples get married, does it make sense for their mother-in-law to ask for a car and a house?

From the perspective of mother-in-law, many parents think it is meaningful. This is a requirement that must be put forward for marriage. Men can't even do this. How can life be better if their daughter marries in the past and doesn't even have a house? Then after their daughter marries in the past, she will live a wandering life without a fixed place. I believe that parents don't want to see such a life, so, Many people know that the marriage law has these Provisions, but we will still ask the man to buy a car and a house for the good of his daughter. We don't want her to live a hard life after she marries. Besides, marriage between men and women does not mean that all people run for property. They mainly want to find a suitable person to live a good life. Therefore, many people think that marriage requires the man to buy a car and a house is of great significance. In the long run, this practice is also beneficial to the subsequent life. The house can not only live, but also appreciate, and the children can receive better education. After all, people now run to the City, and fewer people will live in rural villages in the future.

Of course, these provisions of the marriage law are undoubtedly a fatal blow to those who run for property, which can also prevent people from cheating on marriage, but these Provisions are not a problem for those who want to live a good life. What do you think of this? Do you think it makes sense? What do you think of this problem? Welcome to leave a message in the comment area. Figure / source network.

推薦連結:債務 重組 貸款